<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MacVM - Virtualization and Emulation for Your Mac &#187; Virtual PC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macvm.com/category/virtual-pc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macvm.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:13:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>eWeek Article: Windows on Mac OS X: Virtualization Heats Up</title>
		<link>http://macvm.com/eweek-article-windows-on-mac-os-x-virtualization-heats-up/</link>
		<comments>http://macvm.com/eweek-article-windows-on-mac-os-x-virtualization-heats-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 04:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parallels Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMWare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macvm.com/eweek-article-windows-on-mac-os-x-virtualization-heats-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Rizzo at eWeek has written an article, Windows on Mac OS X: Virtualization Turf War Heats Up about the potential competition that Parallels Desktop for Mac faces from VMware Fusion for Mac as well as Microsoft&#8217;s Virtual PC fading &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://macvm.com/eweek-article-windows-on-mac-os-x-virtualization-heats-up/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/icon/vmware_fusion.jpg" class="alignright"  alt="VMWare Fusion for Mac" width="130" height="130" /><br />
John Rizzo at eWeek has written an article, <a  href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2003606,00.asp">Windows on Mac OS X: Virtualization Turf War Heats Up</a> about the potential competition that <a  href="http://macvm.com/parallels-desktop">Parallels Desktop for Mac</a> faces from <a  href="http://macvm.com/vmware-fusion">VMware Fusion for Mac</a> as well as <a  href="http://macvm.com/virtual-pc/">Microsoft&#8217;s Virtual PC</a> fading away.</p>
<p><strong>Excerpt:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>While Mac OS X Leopard was the focus of Apple&#8217;s Worldwide Developers Conference early in August, the event served as the backdrop for major moves in the platform&#8217;s virtualization market. For a moment, three vendors were standing, but as the cheers of the Mac faithful at the keynote address faded, one took a dive.</p>
<p>For ages the lone developer of Mac virtualization software, Microsoft unexpectedly announced that it would stop developing Virtual PC for Mac. This move coincided with VMware&#8217;s entry into the Mac market and startup Parallel Software International&#8217;s defense of its turf with an announcement of a major upgrade.</p>
<p>Virtualization giant VMware announced that by the end of the year, it would jump into the ring with a beta that would be able to run Windows Vista.</p>
<p>Parallels, a small company based in Herndon, Va., and less than a year old, announced that it would beat VMware to the punch and ship a Vista-ready, final release version of Parallels Desktop before VMware delivered its beta.</p>
<p>At WWDC, however VMware had the goods, previewing pre-beta VMware code running Windows Vista Beta and AutoCAD on a Mac Book Pro. The company said that the Linux and Windows versions of VMware formed the core of the Mac version. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macvm.com/eweek-article-windows-on-mac-os-x-virtualization-heats-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WWDC News: Microsoft Dropping Virtual PC for Mac</title>
		<link>http://macvm.com/wwdc-news-microsoft-dropping-virtual-pc-for-mac/</link>
		<comments>http://macvm.com/wwdc-news-microsoft-dropping-virtual-pc-for-mac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 01:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PowerPC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual PC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macvm.com/wwdc-news-microsoft-dropping-virtual-pc-for-mac/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Cohen of Macworld writes that Microsoft is dropping Virtual PC for Mac. Kind of surprising, since Virtual PC probably helps sell quite a few copies of Windows, but as the article points out, when Microsoft bought Connectix (the original &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://macvm.com/wwdc-news-microsoft-dropping-virtual-pc-for-mac/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/icon/virtual_pc.png" class="alignright"  alt="Virtual PC" width="128" height="128" /><br />
Peter Cohen of Macworld writes that Microsoft is dropping <a  href="http://macvm.com/virtual-pc/">Virtual PC for Mac</a>.  Kind of surprising, since Virtual PC probably helps sell quite a few copies of Windows, but as the article points out, when Microsoft bought Connectix (the original developers of Virtual PC), they had an already-made solution to the issue of Virtual PC on the Mac.  With the move to Intel, they&#8217;d have to develop a completly new version.</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/08/07/vpc/index.php">Quote from the article</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
At Appleâ€™s Worldwide Developer Conference (WWDC) on Monday Microsoftâ€™s Macintosh Business Unit (Mac BU) indicated that it will not develop a new version of Virtual PC, its PC emulation software.</p>
<p>â€œMac BU has made the decision not to move forward with a Universal version of Virtual PC at this time; however, current Virtual PC customers will continue to receive product support,â€ said a Microsoft spokesperson in a statement.</p>
<p>â€œDeveloping a high-quality virtualization solution, such as Virtual PC, for the Intel-based Mac is similar to creating a version 1.0 release due to how closely the product integrates with Mac hardware,â€ the statement concluded.</p>
<p>Virtual PCâ€™s performance is considerably slower than virtual machine software such as Parallels Desktop, which is available for Intel-based Macs, or Boot Camp, Appleâ€™s beta software that enables an Intel Mac to run Windows natively.</p>
<p>Microsoft recognizes the need for some Mac users to access Windows applications, and suggests that â€œalternative solutions offered by Apple and other vendors, combined with a fully packaged retail copy of Windows, will satisfy this need.â€</p></blockquote>
<p><a  href="http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/08/07/vpc/index.php">Full article at Macworld</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macvm.com/wwdc-news-microsoft-dropping-virtual-pc-for-mac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtual PC Free (for PCs) and Windows Vista Licensing</title>
		<link>http://macvm.com/virtual-pc-free-for-pcs-and-windows-vista-licensing/</link>
		<comments>http://macvm.com/virtual-pc-free-for-pcs-and-windows-vista-licensing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtual PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macvm.com/virtual-pc-free-for-pcs-and-windows-vista-licensing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft had a couple of interesting announcements yesterday on the &#8220;Virtually Vista&#8221; blog concerning Virtual PC and Microsoft Windows Vista and Virtualization. The first was that Virtual PC (Microsoft.com) (for PCs) would be free. Virtual PC for Macs would not &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://macvm.com/virtual-pc-free-for-pcs-and-windows-vista-licensing/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/icon/virtual_pc.png" class="alignright"  alt="Virtual PC" width="128" height="128" />Microsoft had a couple of interesting announcements yesterday on the &#8220;Virtually Vista&#8221; blog concerning Virtual PC and Microsoft Windows Vista and Virtualization.</p>
<p>The first was that <a  href="http://www.microsoft.com/virtualpc">Virtual PC (Microsoft.com)</a> (for PCs) would be free.  <a  href="http://macvm.com/virtual-pc/">Virtual PC for Macs</a> would not be free. They also mentioned that virtual PC 2007 (VPC 2007) was in development and that it would support Windows Vista in both host and guest modes, as well sa support for 64-bit Vista as a host OS, and that it will be faster than Virtual PC 2004.</p>
<p>The second  (and fairly relevant to us) involves how Windows Vista Enterprise will be handled in a virtualized environment:</p>
<blockquote><p>Customers who deploy Windows Vista Enterprise have the ability to install up to four (4) copies of the operating system in a virtual machine for a single user on a single device.  Even better, nothing in the license requires that Microsoft Virtualization technologies be used &#8211; if you want to use a competing product as your Virtualization solution, you still get the four extra installs for use with VMs. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macvm.com/virtual-pc-free-for-pcs-and-windows-vista-licensing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

